Gate decision record
- Conditions met: 50% against 100%.
- Closed at the gate: 0 evidence items, 0 confirmations.
Executive Intelligence · Operations and Transformation
A programme and workstream register with milestones, dependencies, risks and owners.
Demonstration: Marlowe Textiles Ltd (fictional) · Manufacturing and export. Fictional data and a scripted answer.
Has the programme met the conditions for passing the stage gate?
Resolve what is missing or out of date. Evidence counts only when it is attached, or when its owner confirms it is current; the sign-off needs the stated completeness.
50% complete · 100% needed
Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.
Benefits, resourcing and risk are evidenced [S1][S2]. Three conditions are not: the benefits check is out of date, only two of nine teams have a change impact assessment, and the independent assurance review has not been commissioned.
A gate is a decision that the next stage may be funded, and it is more useful when it can say no. 3 remain open (First-stage benefits verified in the ledger; Change impact assessed for every affected team; Independent assurance review completed).
Relies on: S1 · Stage gate criteria, gate 2S2 · Programme evidence index
The steering committee chair decides. Approving records the gate as passed and releases the next stage's funding. It does not change the programme's scope or benefits case.
Not ready to approve. Evidence is 50% complete; the sign-off needs 100%.
In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.
The Executive Intelligence story · This capability in the full register