Cascade for the stress scenarios
- Widest reach: Cyber incident (sets off 3 risks).
- Scenario: none sets off none.
Executive Intelligence · Risk and Resilience
Shows recorded dependencies between risks, processes, systems and suppliers.
Demonstration: Fairholme Holdings (fictional) · Diversified holding company. Fictional data and a scripted answer.
If one risk materialises, which others does it set off, and which become the real exposure?
Fail one or more items and see what stops and what only degrades, worked out by following the dependencies.
Choose what materialises. Hard dependencies stop with it; soft ones carry on, degraded.
Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.
Following the recorded links, none sets off none and strains none [S1][S2]. The risk with the widest reach in this map is Cyber incident, which sets off 3 other(s).
Risks reported separately look manageable; chained, the cyber incident reaches reputation through two routes. The register's links are the thing to improve, because a link nobody recorded is a cascade nobody is ready for.
Relies on: S1 · Risk register with recorded linksS2 · Group stress scenarios
The chief risk officer decides. Approving adds the chosen cascade to the group stress scenarios. It does not change any risk rating or control.
Not ready to approve. Fail at least one item first, to see what depends on it.
In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.
The Executive Intelligence story · This capability in the full register