Improvement order
- First: Standard work for pallet building.
- Sensitive to: Hours saved per week (counted one and a half times).
Executive Intelligence · Operations and Transformation
Proposes candidate process improvements from SOP comparison and quality data as suggestions with evidence.
Demonstration: Brightwater Logistics (fictional) · Logistics. Fictional data and a scripted answer.
Which process improvements should we start first?
Change how much each criterion matters. The ranking is recomputed, and the page tells you whether the leader would survive a different judgement.
The leader would change if Hours saved per week (counted one and a half times). Treat the order as sensitive to that judgement.
Leader's margin over the next option: 0.11. The leader can change under another weighting.
Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.
The six shortlisted ideas are scored on effect, effort, quality and reach, from the register and the process data [S1][S2]. The order is could change under the weightings tested; it would change if Hours saved per week (counted one and a half times).
Four slots means the third and fourth places matter. Choose the set so that at least one is a quick win; improvement programmes lose support when nothing visible lands in the first month.
Relies on: S1 · Idea register, 40 ideas, shortlisted 6S2 · Process volumes and cycle times
The head of continuous improvement decides. Approving sets the order in which ideas are resourced. It does not change any process.
Ready for the reviewer.
In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.
The Executive Intelligence story · This capability in the full register