Interfaces to protect
- Furthest reach: Production planning team (4 items).
- In this scenario: none stops none.
Executive Intelligence · Advanced Executive Intelligence
A graph of people, teams, systems, suppliers and obligations from recorded relationships.
Demonstration: Fernhill Packaging Ltd (fictional) · Manufacturing. Fictional data and a scripted answer.
If a team is moved or removed in the reorganisation, which other teams and processes depend on it?
Fail one or more items and see what stops and what only degrades, worked out by following the dependencies.
Choose what is moved or disrupted. Hard dependencies stop with it; soft ones carry on, degraded.
Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.
Following the dependencies, disrupting none stops none and degrades none [S1][S2]. The team whose disruption reaches furthest is Production planning team, reaching 4 other item(s).
A reporting line is easy to move; the working relationships behind it are what the map shows. If planning moves, the interface to line operations and to customer promises needs an owner on day one.
Relies on: S1 · Team dependency mapS2 · Reorganisation proposal
The chief executive decides. Approving records the interfaces the reorganisation plan must protect. It does not move any team.
Not ready to approve. Fail at least one item first, to see what depends on it.
In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.
The Executive Intelligence story · This capability in the full register