Skip to content
Request a demonstration

Executive Intelligence · Customers and Commercial Strategy

Customer Concentration and Retention Risk

Revenue concentration and retention indicators from verified customer and revenue data, drawn from a connected CRM or ledger.

Demonstration: Pinecrest Foods plc (fictional) · Food manufacturing. Fictional data and a scripted answer.

The situation

Organisation
Pinecrest Foods plc (fictional)
Who is asking
Chief commercial officer
Industry
Food manufacturing
What happened
Two retailers account for over half of sales, and one has asked for a price review that could end the relationship.

The question asked

How much of our profit would we lose if the largest retailer left, and how fast could we replace it?

What it reads, and who can see the result

  • Sales and margin by customer exportRevenue and contribution margin per retailer.
  • Pipeline registerOther opportunities and their timing.
Reads
Sales and margin by customer, aggregated, and the pipeline summary.
Does not read
Contract terms.
Permission
Commercial finance access.
Who sees it
The chief commercial officer and the CFO.

Try it

Change the assumptions. Every result and the answer below are recomputed from them, and a warning appears when a result crosses a stated limit.

Assumptions you can change
100%
25%
GBP 1,500,000
Revenue lost
GBP 52,000,000The largest retailer buys 52,000,000 a year at a 24% contribution margin.
Contribution lost
GBP 12,480,000
Contribution recovered in year one
GBP 3,120,000
Net profit effect in year one
-GBP 7,860,000
Share of group profit this represents
52%Group operating profit is 18,000,000.

A first-year loss of more than 3,000,000 would breach the profit range the board was told to expect.

The answer

Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.

Losing 100% of the largest retailer costs GBP 12,480,000 of contribution; net effect in year one -GBP 7,860,000.

The retailer buys 52,000,000 a year at a 24% contribution margin [S1], so a full loss removes GBP 12,480,000. Replacing 25% of it from other customers in the first year recovers GBP 3,120,000 [S2], and overhead cuts of GBP 1,500,000 soften the rest.

The number to take into the price review is the share of group profit at stake: 52%. A negotiator who knows what walking away costs both sides negotiates differently from one who does not.

Relies on: S1 · Sales and contribution by customerS2 · New-business pipeline summary

No approval is needed for this result: it is read-only insight, and nothing consequential happens because of it.

What it produces

chart

Cost of losing the largest retailer

  • Contribution lost GBP 12,480,000 · Recovered GBP 3,120,000 · Net -GBP 7,860,000 · Share of group profit 52%.
recommendation

For the price review

  • Know the walk-away cost before the meeting, and the cost to the retailer too.

Limits of this example

  • Replacement speed is a judgement.
  • Ignores knock-on effects on other retailers' terms.
  • This is a scripted demonstration on fictional data. No model was called and no real organisation, person or result is shown.