Skip to content
Request a demonstration

Global Compliance · Expanded Global Compliance

Compliance Cost Intelligence

Estimate the cost of operating compliance, remediation costs, resource commitments and potentially avoidable spend, keeping actual, calculated, estimated and unverified…

Demonstration: Brightwater Software (fictional) · Software. Fictional data and a scripted answer.

The situation

Organisation
Brightwater Software (fictional)
Who is asking
Head of governance, risk and compliance
Industry
Software
What happened
Compliance costs have grown across overlapping frameworks, and the board wants to know what consolidating controls would save.

The question asked

What does compliance cost us a year, and what could we save by testing overlapping controls once?

What it reads, and who can see the result

  • Framework control mappings registerWhich controls satisfy which frameworks.
  • Compliance cost ledger exportSpend by activity.
Reads
Control mappings and the aggregated cost of compliance activities.
Does not read
Individual salaries or evidence content.
Permission
GRC team access.
Who sees it
The head of GRC and the CFO.

Try it

Change the assumptions. Every result and the answer below are recomputed from them, and a warning appears when a result crosses a stated limit.

Assumptions you can change
3
40%
8
USD 85
Control tests per year today
1,260420 controls, tested once for each framework.
Tests removed
504
Annual saving
USD 342,720
Annual testing cost today
USD 856,800
Annual testing cost after
USD 514,080

The answer

Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.

Testing overlapping controls once saves about USD 342,720 a year, from USD 856,800 to USD 514,080.

Today 1,260 control tests are run a year because each of 3 frameworks tests its controls separately [S1]. If 40% of them are shared and tested once, 504 fewer tests are needed [S2].

The saving depends on auditors accepting one test for several frameworks, which is a conversation, not a switch. Treat the figure as the prize if that conversation goes well.

Relies on: S1 · Control mapping across frameworksS2 · Compliance cost ledger

No approval is needed for this result: it is read-only insight, and nothing consequential happens because of it.

What it produces

chart

Testing cost, before and after

  • Today USD 856,800 → after USD 514,080 (saving USD 342,720).

Limits of this example

  • Only testing cost is modelled, not the cost of change.
  • Assumes each test takes the same time.
  • This is a scripted demonstration on fictional data. No model was called and no real organisation, person or result is shown.