Skip to content
Request a demonstration

Global Compliance · Expanded Global Compliance

Contract Compliance Intelligence

Read customer-authorised contracts for obligations, service commitments, deadlines, renewals, restrictions, responsibilities and compliance risks, with citations to the…

Demonstration: Aldercroft Facilities Services (fictional) · Facilities management. Fictional data and a scripted answer.

The situation

Organisation
Aldercroft Facilities Services (fictional)
Who is asking
Contract compliance lead
Industry
Facilities management
What happened
A major client contract has audit rights, and the lead wants to know whether the evidence of our obligations is in order before they are exercised.

The question asked

For this client contract, can we evidence each obligation we owe, and what is missing?

What it reads, and who can see the result

  • Contract obligations extract documentObligations we owe the client.
  • Evidence library registerRecords we hold against each obligation.
Reads
The obligations extracted from the contract and the evidence records' index.
Does not read
The client's confidential data or the evidence content.
Permission
Contract compliance's access to the library.
Who sees it
The contract compliance lead and the account director.

Try it

Resolve what is missing or out of date. Evidence counts only when it is attached, or when its owner confirms it is current; the sign-off needs the stated completeness.

Service

  • Monthly service report delivered by day 5 PresentTwelve reports on file
  • Response to a critical incident within 2 hours PresentIncident log with timings

People

  • Staff on site hold the required security clearance StaleClearance list last updated 13 months ago
  • Annual training refreshed for site staff MissingNo completion records for the second half-year

Assurance

  • Insurance certificates held at the required cover PresentCertificates current
  • Subcontractors approved in writing by the client MissingTwo subcontractors used without recorded approval

The answer

Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.

Evidence of our contract obligations is 55% complete; the audit threshold is 95%.

Four obligations are evidenced [S1][S2]. Three are not: the clearance list is stale, half a year of training records is missing, and two subcontractors were used without the written approval the contract requires.

The subcontractor point is a possible breach, not just a missing file: resolving it needs a conversation with the client, not a document. 3 remain open (Staff on site hold the required security clearance; Annual training refreshed for site staff; Subcontractors approved in writing by the client).

Relies on: S1 · Contract obligations, schedule 3S2 · Evidence library index

Review and approval

The contract compliance lead decides. Approving confirms the evidence file for the audit. It does not assert that the contract has been performed.

Not ready to approve. Evidence is 55% complete; the sign-off needs 95%.

In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.

What it produces

evidenceDraft, not approved

Audit evidence index

  • Completeness 55% against 95%.
  • Resolved: 0 supplied, 0 confirmed current.

Limits of this example

  • A document can be attached that does not show the obligation was met; the auditor tests substance.
  • A potential breach is a matter for the account director and counsel, not a checklist.
  • This is a scripted demonstration on fictional data. No model was called and no real organisation, person or result is shown.

More in Global Compliance