Skip to content
Request a demonstration

Reporting and analytics

Report Studio

Reports are rebuilt by hand each time, and two versions of a number circulate.

Demonstration: Osterley Components GmbH (fictional) · Industrial manufacturing. Fictional data and a scripted answer.

The situation

Organisation
Osterley Components GmbH (fictional)
Who is asking
Financial controller
Industry
Industrial manufacturing
What happened
The monthly report is generated from several systems, and the controller wants every figure checked against its source before it goes to the board.

The question asked

Which figures in this draft report do not tie back to their source, and which differences are explained?

What it reads, and who can see the result

  • Draft report figures exportEach figure with its stated source.
  • Source totals exportThe totals in the source systems.
Reads
The report's figures and the source totals.
Does not read
Transaction-level data.
Permission
Finance reporting access.
Who sees it
The financial controller and the finance director.

Try it

Review each flagged record: confirm it or dismiss it. The totals and the answer below follow your decisions.

FigureSourceStated vs sourceDifference (EUR)FindingDecision
Revenue, OctoberLedger3,180,000 vs 3,180,0000MatchedNone needed
Gross profitLedger1,044,000 vs 1,053,0009,000Report is lower than the ledger by 9,000
Orders receivedSales system412 vs 4120MatchedNone needed
Order backlog valueSales system6,900,000 vs 6,270,000630,000Report includes cancelled orders
Cash at month endBank1,040,000 vs 1,040,0000MatchedNone needed
InventoryLedger2,310,000 vs 2,285,00025,000Report predates a posted stock adjustment
Flagged
3 of 6 · EUR 664,000
Correct before release
0 · EUR 0
Explained
0 · EUR 0
Undecided
3 · EUR 664,000

The answer

Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.

3 of 6 figures do not tie to their source, EUR 664,000 apart in all.

Three figures differ: gross profit by a small amount, the backlog by a large one because cancelled orders are still counted, and inventory because a stock adjustment was posted after the report was drawn [S1][S2]. The backlog is the one a board would act on, so it matters most.

You have marked 0 to correct before release (EUR 0 of difference) and 0 as explained (EUR 0); 3 are undecided.

Relies on: S1 · Draft board report, OctoberS2 · Source totals, ledger and sales system

Review and approval

The financial controller decides. Approving releases the report with the corrections the controller marked, and notes the explained differences. It does not change any ledger entry.

Not ready to approve. 3 flagged figures are still undecided. Confirm or dismiss each one first.

In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.

What it produces

reportDraft, not approved

Report tie-out

  • To correct: 0 figures, EUR 0.
  • Explained: 0 figures, EUR 0.
evidenceDraft, not approved

Tie-out record

  • Each figure shows the source and the difference found.

Limits of this example

  • Ties figures to their stated sources; it cannot say the source is right.
  • A report that ties can still be misleading in its framing.
  • This is a scripted demonstration on fictional data. No model was called and no real organisation, person or result is shown.